Total Cost Reporting: Helping clients see price and value

For financial advisors, the tension between price and value has been growing for years. A series of regulatory initiatives has increased transparency around the costs clients pay for investment products and advice. Total Cost Reporting, or TCR, is the latest step.

Beginning with annual reports for the year ending December 31, 2026, clients will receive enhanced information about investment fund costs. But greater transparency around price does not automatically create greater understanding of value. That is where advisors come in.

Research into consumer psychology and investor behaviour can help advisors anticipate clients’ reactions, explain what they are seeing, and put those costs into a meaningful context.

When the number becomes the story

In his study The Impact of Salient Fees: Evidence from the Mutual Fund Market (This hyperlink will open in a new tab), finance professor Sitikantha Parida examined a U.S. rule requiring mutual funds to show fund expenses separately in dollar terms.

After the change, average retail fund fees declined by 27 basis points compared with the preceding five-year period, and investment flows became more sensitive to fees. Parida concluded that displaying fees separately in dollars made them more salient and increased investors’ awareness of them.

That’s not to say TCR will necessarily lead to lower prices in Canada. But by making costs more visible, it may make them more likely to come up in client conversations.

The lesson for advisors? Presentation affects perception. Even when the fee itself has not changed, expressing it as a single annual dollar amount can make it feel more concrete, immediate, and surprisingly large. Clients may react to the number before considering what it includes or how it relates to their strategy.

The “pain of paying” concept

In their seminal paper The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt (This hyperlink will open in a new tab), MIT professor Drazen Prelec and Carnegie Mellon professor George Loewenstein advanced a concept known as the “pain of paying.”

They argued that payment is not experienced as a purely rational trade-off. Paying can produce immediate psychological discomfort. They also observed that payments are easier to evaluate when they evoke thoughts about the benefits being financed.

That describes the TCR challenge well. The client sees the cost concentrated into one annual figure, yet the value may have accumulated gradually, or even imperceptibly, through investment mistakes avoided, plans adjusted, and advice delivered over time.

When the cost is highly visible but the value is dispersed, advisors need to help clients reconnect the two.

First, address the reaction

Before explaining the report, give the client room to respond. You might ask:

• “What stands out to you most?”
• “Is the figure different from what you expected?”
• “What questions does it raise for you?”

Each reaction calls for a different conversation. Responding immediately with a defence risks answering a question the client has not actually asked. Listen closely, and consider a response such as:

“I understand why seeing the full amount in dollars would get your attention. Let’s look at what it includes and how it relates to the value you receive.”

Second, explain what the fee includes

In plain language, explain that the total reflects more than advisor compensation. It may include financial planning and advice, portfolio management, administration, reporting, regulatory requirements, and applicable taxes. For insurance-based contracts, it may also include valuable guarantees that protect capital and beneficiary values.

Then clarify whether anything has actually changed. In many cases, the costs have not changed—they are simply being presented more visibly.

Keep the explanation focused. Clients who feel overwhelmed are unlikely to benefit from a technical tour through every fee category. Explain the most important points, check their understanding, and add detail where it is useful.

Third, put price in the context of value

Once clients have had a chance to express themselves and been shown what the fee includes, connect it to work that has impacted their financial life. Avoid broad claims about “service” or “expertise.” Point instead to specific decisions, outcomes, and support, such as:

• Building a strategy around their goals and time horizon
• Selecting products suited to their needs and risk profile
• Adjusting the plan as markets or personal circumstances changed
• Helping them remain disciplined during volatility

Then invite the client to assess the relationship:

• “Which parts of our work together have been most valuable to you?”
• “What decisions have you felt better equipped to make?”
• “Is there anything you expected from the relationship that you are not receiving?”

The goal is not to insist that the relationship is valuable, but to help the client evaluate whether the advice, strategy, and support they receive justify what they pay.

Avoid reducing that value to investment performance alone. Remember that much of your value—whether it’s helping a client avoid a poorly timed decision or adjusting a plan during a major life change—will never appear on their statement.

Watch out for these common thinking shortcuts

These shortcuts are normal ways people try to grapple with complex decisions. Be aware of them so you can respond appropriately.

Anchoring. The client may be comparing the fee with a friend’s experience, a lower-cost product, or an assumption about what advice should cost. Ask, “What are you comparing the amount with?” Then bring the discussion back to the client’s particular strategy, services, and needs.

Loss aversion. A visible fee can feel like a loss, while its benefits may be less tangible or spread over time. Try asking: “Which parts of your financial plan would be more difficult to manage without the advice and support you receive?” This can help reconnect the cost to the goals and decisions it supports.

Oversimplification. This can sound like “a lower cost must be better.” Cost matters, but it is one dimension of a decision. A balanced response might be: “Cost is an important part of the decision. Let’s look at what lower-cost alternatives provide, what they leave out, and whether they would serve your goals as well.”

From transparency to trust

TCR may lead to more questions, but it can also strengthen the client relationship.

In a 2018 CFA Institute survey (This hyperlink will open in a new tab) of more than 3,000 retail investors across 12 global markets, 84% said full disclosure of fees was important to their trust in an advisor. Yet only 48% were satisfied with the disclosure they received. That gap creates an opportunity for advisors who discuss fees clearly and openly.

Meanwhile, CFA Institute’s 2022 Investor Trust Study (This hyperlink will open in a new tab) found that 62% of advised investors were willing to pay additional fees for greater customization. In other words, many clients are willing to pay more when the added value is personal, relevant, and clear.

TCR calls us to demonstrate openness, make value more concrete, and invite an honest discussion. The conversation may begin with price, but handled well, it can lead to a clearer understanding of value and a deeper client relationship.

Want more support for client conversations?

Explore Beneva’s Advisor blog for insights and content designed to help advisors guide clients through important investment decisions.